AMD Claims 1000 FPS Is Possible With Ryzen 9800X3D, 9950X3D, and 9955HX3D Under Recommended Settings
AMD is making bold performance claims for its Ryzen 9000X3D processors, suggesting that hitting 1000 FPS in competitive esports titles is achievable with the right hardware and settings. While esports players are accustomed to ultra-high frame rates in games like CS2 and Valorant - often reaching 600–700 FPS - crossing the 1000 FPS threshold has traditionally required extreme overclocking setups, such as Der8auer’s LN2-cooled Intel Core i9-14900K + RTX 4090 run.
Now, AMD says that milestone is possible under standard enthusiast conditions with CPUs like the Ryzen 7 9800X3D, Ryzen 9 9950X3D, and even the mobile Ryzen 9 9955HX3D.
AMD’s Recommended Settings for 1000 FPS
In a marketing infographic, AMD outlined the configuration it used to achieve the feat:
GPUs: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 and RTX 5090D (AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT achieved the milestone in only two games)
Memory: DDR5 at 6000 MT/s CL30
OS: Windows 11 (version 24H2)
Settings: 1080p resolution, VBS (Virtualization-Based Security) disabled, and AMD SAM (Smart Access Memory) disabled
Under these conditions, AMD claims 1000 FPS was hit in six esports titles:
Counter-Strike 2
Valorant
League of Legends
PUBG
Naraka: Bladepoint
(Unspecified sixth title, presumably another competitive shooter or MOBA)
Games that can reach 1000fps with AMD Ryzen 9000X3D CPUs pic.twitter.com/nx2dwr7Jnr
— 孤城Hardware (@realVictor_M) September 14, 2025
While impressive on paper, the real-world benefit of 1000 FPS is questionable. The fastest gaming monitor currently announced is HKC’s 750 Hz prototype, meaning that frame rates above that threshold won’t translate directly to perceptible gains. Still, ultra-high FPS can reduce latency, a critical factor for competitive esports.
Notably, AMD did not publish detailed results for the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D laptop CPU, though it claims similar capability. However, with laptop displays rarely exceeding 360 Hz, hitting 1000 FPS on mobile hardware is practically unplayable beyond synthetic bragging rights.
As with most marketing claims, AMD’s 1000 FPS achievement will need independent third-party testing to validate. Past benchmarks of Ryzen 9000X3D CPUs paired with RTX 5090/5080 cards generally topped out in the 600–700 FPS range in these games, suggesting that AMD’s scenario represents a highly optimized, best-case setup rather than typical user performance.
Do you think achieving 1000 FPS has real value in esports, or is AMD chasing a number that doesn’t matter until 1000 Hz monitors exist?
